Every poker player can remember improvements in his thought process. We know how important the decision-making part of poker is, so we have the tendency to jump straight to it. When we started with poker, it was: “I have an Ace and a Jack, and those are pretty good so i’m going all in!!” Then later it became, “I know hand strength is relative, so I’m thinking about his hand… and I think mine’s better…. so I’m going all in!” Then eventually it became, “Hand strength is relative, and mine’s better, and I think he can call me with worse hands, so I’m going all in!”. Hopefully you can see how the thought process gets filled out and our decisions eventually become better.
Many (all?) players cut short the process of gathering and evaluating information before the decision making stage. Essentially, they reach an amount of information that lets them solve basic situations, they get comfortable using that information, then they get lost whenever a new situation comes up that requires information they haven’t been accumulating. Let’s talk about one of these spots now.
A wise friend, Ben, got in a discussion with me over a hand. Late at night, in a HU live game (the kind we’ve played thousands of for exactly zero dollars) he had made a loose call against my river shove. I was bluffing, and lost. I desperately tried to explain to him how my range crushed his hand and how bad of a call it was. He replied: “That may be, but I’m not playing against a range. I’m playing against your hand. And you either have it or you don’t.”
You either have it or you don’t.
Hmmm.
So what about ranges? Do those not matter? Won’t good players play a number of hands in the same fashion? With different intents?
Damn straight they will, but it’s the last sentence that matters. “With different intents.”
Let’s consider the river. When somebody bets the river, it is invariably for one of two reasons: 1) to get value from a worse hand, or 2) to make a better hand fold. There is no in between, no two-way bet here. It’s only one of the two. And the other guy knows damn well whether he’s bluffing or not. However, most handreaders seem to ignore that obvious question– is he bluffing me or value betting me?– and proceed straight to the “how does my hand do against his range?” question. Well, the truth is that he has two different ranges. One is for value betting and one is for bluffing. If you can figure out which one is more likely, you can test your hand against that range. It’s only if you think that each is equally likely that you have to evaluate your hand against his entire composite range. Guess what? It’s pretty damn rare when it’s equally likely someone is valuebetting you or bluffing you.
I’m going to give you three examples.
First was a hand between CTS and Ike (i think its Ike, somebody correct me if I’m wrong). Both players are 230ish bb deep). Cole (extremely loose and aggressive) raises UTG, Ike calls on the button with 66. Flop comes down As7c6d. Cole bets, Ike makes a raise in position, and cole calls. The turn is a Ts. Cole checks, Ike bets (for value), and cole shoves all in (a little less than 200bb on top).
Second example can be read here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=196036&highlight=punketty. Punketty, extremely loose and aggressive, c/r the turn on a Ad9cQh8h board. Hero holds AhQd.
Third example, and most classic example of all, can be read here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=38&highlight=mahatma. Villain is Prahlad Friedman, extremely loose and aggressive. Prah c/c flop on a KTx board, leads for pot on a blank turn, and shoves an A river. Hero holds AK.
In every single one of these threads, the first 5-10 people who jump in say the same thing: “you have a strong hand against a tricky, aggressive opponent. you can’t fold!” The gut reaction is to address our hand vs his hand range on the whole.
Now, heres an exercise for you guys to try at home– Try to decide in each example, whether or not CTS, Punketty, and Prahlad are more likely to be bluffing or value betting. If you decide value betting, then try to decide how our hand stands up against his value betting range. Voila, you are better at handreading.
PS: nobody said this would be easy. and if they did, i didnt get the memo.
good luck from thailand
A